=maz=
Member
And this is what makes no sense to me. Yes I ride my race-bike harder than my commuter but I also service the race-bike MUCH more than is required. If KTM want to advertise their bikes as "Ready To Race" they should do better...and if their quality control was better, based on the anecdotal evidence here, they would be able to offer some form of warranty on stock/production race-bikes with some measure of confidence.Warranty usually doesn't apply in this case anyway....so no change there...
If I don't race my RC390 and thrash the shit out of it on a daily basis with the recommended service intervals is it a better chance of breakdown or less?
Rhetorical question really as I know the answer and know nothing will change.
We have had a 50/50 hit/miss rate with one bike having zero problems and the other having quite a few...nothing that makes me want to take to the bike with a sledge-hammer but just annoying stuff that has sapped a little of the joy.
Overall I absolutely love the bike when I ride it. When I look at the quality of the powder-coating on the frame/rims I am not happy...great to ride, not to admire workmanship.